AIDS · 2010 · 190 citations · 36 references
Public HealthHealth PromotionInfectious Disease ControlDisease PreventionHiv ControlHiv PreventionBiomedical Hiv PreventionDisease ControlDisease Prevention StrategiesHiv EpidemiologyPrevention StrategiesStructural Interventions For Hiv PreventionBehavioral Hiv PreventionCombination Hiv PreventionHiv Prevention EffectivenessHiv Risk ReductionHuman Rights-based PreventionImpact Measurement FrameworksPrevention Implementation ScienceStructural Hiv Prevention
Combination prevention integrates behavioural, biomedical, and structural interventions tailored to local epidemics, recognizing that context‑specific packages are needed and that structural interventions address social and legal constraints that create risk environments. The study aims to realign program priorities using epidemic estimates and to strengthen evidence on component synergies through multi‑method outcome measurement and data triangulation. Using “know your epidemic” and “know your response” analyses, the authors align priorities and employ multiple methods and data triangulation to measure outcomes and build evidence on synergies. Applying the principles of combination prevention systematically and consistently in HIV programme planning, with due attention to context, can increase HIV programme effectiveness.
Evidence-informed and human rights-based combination prevention combines behavioural, biomedical, and structural interventions to address both the immediate risks and underlying causes of vulnerability to HIV infection, and the pathways that link them. Because these are context-specific, no single prescription or standard package will apply universally. Anchored in 'know your epidemic' estimates of where the next 1000 infections will occur and 'know your response' analyses of resource allocation and programming gaps, combination prevention strategies seek to realign programme priorities for maximum effect to reduce epidemic reproductive rates at local, regional, and national levels. Effective prevention means tailoring programmes to local epidemics and ensuring that components are delivered with the intensity, quality, and scale necessary to achieve intended effects. Structural interventions, addressing the social, economic, cultural, and legal constraints that create HIV risk environments and undermine the agency of individuals to protect themselves and others, are also public goods in their own right. Applying the principles of combination prevention systematically and consistently in HIV programme planning, with due attention to context, can increase HIV programme effectiveness. Better outcome and impact measurement using multiple methods and data triangulation can build the evidence base on synergies between the components of combination prevention at individual, group, and societal levels, facilitating iterative knowledge translation within and among programmes.
36
Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health
Michael Marmot, Sharon Friel, Ruth Bell et al. · The Lancet · 2008 · 7.9K citations