Publication | Closed Access
Osmotic and Ionic Regulation in the Aquatic Caecilian<i>Typhlonectes compressicauda</i>and the Terrestrial Caecilian<i>Ichthyophis kohtaoensis</i>
13
Citations
15
References
1990
Year
BiologyHydrobiologyOsmotic StressSodium HomeostasisPhysiologyTerrestrial IchthyophisWater BiologyWater QualityAquatic OrganismIonic Regulatory CapabilitiesLower Osmotic PermeabilityMedicineOsmoregulationNephrologyIonic Regulation
The terrestrial caecilian Ichthyophis kohtaoensis and the aquatic caecilian Typhlonectes compressicauda were comparedfor osmotic and ionic regulatory capabilities. The aquatic form has a lower rate of osmotic water uptake (0.09 vs. 0.24 μL/10 g/h), suggesting a lower osmotic permeability. The terrestrial Ichthyophis reduces its osmotic flux to 0.17μL/10 g/h) after 3 d of acclimation to water. The aquatic Typhlonectes produces a more dilute urine and has a lower glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (0.139 mL/10 g/h) and fractional water reabsorption (9.5%) than the terrestrial Ichthyophis (0.267 mL/10 g/h, 56.9%). Ichthyophis increases urine flow by reducing fractional water reabsorption to 32.3% when placed in water; GFR does not increase significantly. Analyses of net and unidirectional ionic fluxes and transcutaneous potential differences showed that both species actively transport Na⁺ and Cl⁻ across their body surfaces. The aquatic Typhlonectes has an apparent Km of 0.15 rmM for Na⁺ and 0.34 mM for Cl⁻, while the terrestrial Ichthyophis has an apparent Km of 0.65 for Na⁺ and 0.32 for Cl⁻. The apparent Km values did not differ significantly. The Vmax (capacity) was 1.97μeq/10 g/h for Na⁺ and 1.16μeq/10 g/h for Cl⁻ in Typhlonectes; the corresponding values for Ichthyophis were 3.00 and 2.50. The values did not difer significantly for the two species.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1