Physical Review Letters · 2018 · 89 citations · 14 references
ComputingComputer SciencePhysicsQuantum ComputingQuantum MechanicsTheory Of ComputationQuantum CommunicationQuantum ComputationQuantum CryptographyBlind Quantum ComputationConstant-round ProtocolsEntangled StatesHierarchyPolynomial HierarchyPolynomial Time ComplexityQuantum Circuit VerificationQuantum Verification
We propose a set of protocols for verifying quantum computing at any time after the computation itself has been performed. We provide two constructions: one requires five entangled provers and a completely classical verifier; the other requires a single prover, a verifier, who is restricted to measuring qubits in the $X$ or $Z$ basis, and one-way quantum communication from the prover to the verifier. These results demonstrate that the verification can be achieved independently from the blindness. We also show that a constant round protocol with a single prover and a completely classical verifier is not possible, unless bounded error quantum polynomial time (BQP) is contained in the third level of the polynomial hierarchy.
14
Richard P. Feynman · Foundations of Physics · 1986 · 1.7K citations
Ethan Bernstein, Umesh Vazirani · SIAM Journal on Computing · 1997 · 1.5K citations
Ethan Bernstein, Umesh Vazirani · 1993 · 1.3K citations
Demonstration of Blind Quantum Computing
Stefanie Barz, Elham Kashefi, Anne Broadbent et al. · Science · 2012 · 472 citations · Full text
Classical command of quantum systems
Ben W. Reichardt, Falk Unger, Umesh Vazirani · Nature · 2013 · 392 citations