Publication | Open Access
Between-Days Reliability and Sensitivity of Common Fatigue Measures in Rugby Players
83
Citations
20
References
2015
Year
Physical ActivityMean ForceSport InjuryFatigue ManagementKinesiologyExercisePhysical ExerciseApplied PhysiologySport PhysiologySport ScienceFatigue MarkersHealth SciencesPhysical FitnessRehabilitationCommon Fatigue MeasuresExercise ScienceHigh-performance SportPhysiologyExercise PhysiologyBetween-days ReliabilityRugby Players
This study established the between-days reliability and sensitivity of a countermovement jump (CMJ), plyometric push-up, well-being questionnaire, and whole-blood creatine kinase concentration ([CK]) in elite male youth rugby union players. The study also established the between-days reliability of 1, 2, or 3 CMJs and plyometric-push-up attempts. Twenty-five players completed tests on 2 occasions separated by 5 d (of rest). Between-days typical error, coefficient of variation (CV), and smallest worthwhile change (SWC) were calculated for the well-being questionnaire, [CK], and CMJ and plyometric-push-up metrics (peak/mean power, peak/mean force, height, flight time, and flight-time to contraction-time ratio) for 1 maximal effort or taking the highest score from 2 or 3 maximal efforts. The results suggest that CMJ mean power (2 or 3 attempts), peak force, or mean force and plyometric-push-up mean force (from 2 or 3 attempts) should be used for assessing lower- and upper-body neuromuscular function, respectively, due to both their acceptable reliability (CV < 5%) and good sensitivity (CV < SWC). The well-being questionnaire and [CK] demonstrated between-days CVs >5% (7.1% and 26.1%, respectively) and poor sensitivity (CV > SWC). The findings from this study can be used when interpreting fatigue markers to make an objective decision about a player's readiness to train or compete.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1