Irinotecan versus best supportive care (BSC) as second-line therapy in gastric cancer: A randomized phase III study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO)

Peter Thuss‐Patience, Albrecht Kretzschmar, Timo M. Deist, Axel Hinke, Dmitry Bichev, B. Lebedinzew, Guido Schumacher, Bernhard Gebauer, Veronica Maier, Peter Reichardt

Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2009 · 68 citations · 0 references

Concepts

Abstract

4540 Background: Up to now the value of 2 nd -line therapy for metastatic gastric cancer is unclear. So far there are no randomized phase III data comparing 2 nd -line chemotherapy to BSC. Irinotecan has proven activity in 1 st -line therapy. In this randomized phase III study we compared irinotecan to BSC to evaluate the value of 2 nd - line chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Methods: Prospective multicenter randomized phase III study, open label. Eligibility: Metastatic or locally advanced gastro-esophageal junction or gastric adenocarcinoma. Objective tumor progession (PD) within 6 months after 1 st - line chemotherapy. ECOG PS 0–2. Statistics: Primary endpoint: Overall survival (OS). Hypothesis: H1: OS(Irinotecan)>OS(BSC). Calculated number of pts needed (power 80%, alpha error 5%): 60 pts per arm. Stratification for a) PD less versus (vs) more than 3 months after 1 st line chemotherapy, b) ECOG PS 0/1 vs 2. Treatment: Arm A: Irinotecan 250mg/m 2 q3w (1 st cycle) to be increased to 350 mg/m 2 , depending on toxicity. Arm B: BSC Results: Between Oct 2002 and Dec 2006 40 pts were randomized. The study was closed prematurely due to poor accrual. Arm A:21 pts, arm B 19 pts. Median age A: 58 yrs (43–73), B: 55 yrs (35–72); PD less vs more than 3 months after 1 st -line chemotherapy: A: 18 / 3, B: 17 / 2pts. ECOG PS 0/1 vs 2: A: 17/ 4, B: 14/ 5pts. Pre-treatment with cisplatin: A: 21, B:19 pts. Arm A: 68 cycles administered in 21 pts. Toxicity: (main CTC grade 3/ 4): Nausea 1 pt, vomiting 1 pt, diarrhoea: 5 pts, neutropenic fever: 2 pts, data incomplete 6 pts. In 37% of 19 evaluable pts irinotecan dose was escalated to 350mg/m 2 . Response (19 pts evaluable): No objective responses, SD 58%, PD 42%. Improvement of tumor related symptoms: 44% of pts in arm A, 5% in arm B. Survival: (evaluable pts arm A 21, arm B 18): median survival arm A: 123 days (95%CI 95–216), arm B 72.5 days (95%CI 41–106); OS: HR=2.85 (95%CI 1.41–5.79), Logrank test (two-sided): p=0.0027. Conclusions: To our knowledge this is the first randomized phase III study investigating 2 nd - line chemotherapy in gastric cancer. Irinotecan as 2 nd -line chemotherapy significantly prolongs overall survival compared to BSC. 2 nd -line chemotherapy can now be considered as a proven option in gastric cancer. [Table: see text]