IS PASSIVE SURVEILLANCE ALWAYS INSENSITIVE?

John R. Harkess, B Gildon, PAMELA W. ARCHER, Gregory R. Istre

American Journal of Epidemiology · 1988 · 20 citations · 0 references

Concepts

Abstract

The authors studied the reporting of shigellosis in Oklahoma to evaluate the sensitivity of the state-based passive surveillance system for shigellosis. They found that passive surveillance for shigellosis can be more sensitive than has been previously observed. Laboratory-based reporting was found to be far superior to reporting by physicians.