Physical review. A/Physical review, A · 2016 · 496 citations · 22 references
ComputingElectrical EngineeringPhysicsCondensed Matter PhysicsQuantum ComputingQuantum MechanicsQuantum BitsQuantum ComputationQuantum ControlQuantum GatesQuantum Hardware ArchitecturesSuperconducting QubitsControl Of Superconducting QubitsHamiltonian OperatorsQuantum Circuit BenchmarkingQubit Gate OperationsRandomized BenchmarkingSuperconducting Qubit ArchitecturesTwo-qubit Gates
The cross‑resonance gate is an all‑microwave two‑qubit operation that does not require tunability, making it suitable for 2D superconducting qubit architectures, but its performance has been limited by long gate times and fidelities of only 94–96 %. The authors developed a calibration procedure that accurately measures the full cross‑resonance Hamiltonian and then introduced a second microwave drive tone on the target qubit to cancel unwanted Hamiltonian components, thereby improving fidelity. These advances shortened two‑qubit gate times and raised interleaved randomized‑benchmarking fidelities above 99 %, with measurements agreeing with theory and revealing the error terms that previously limited performance.
We present improvements in both theoretical understanding and experimental implementation of the cross resonance (CR) gate that have led to shorter two-qubit gate times and interleaved randomized benchmarking fidelities exceeding 99%. The CR gate is an all-microwave two-qubit gate offers that does not require tunability and is therefore well suited to quantum computing architectures based on 2D superconducting qubits. The performance of the gate has previously been hindered by long gate times and fidelities averaging 94-96%. We have developed a calibration procedure that accurately measures the full CR Hamiltonian. The resulting measurements agree with theoretical analysis of the gate and also elucidate the error terms that have previously limited the gate fidelity. The increase in fidelity that we have achieved was accomplished by introducing a second microwave drive tone on the target qubit to cancel unwanted components of the CR Hamiltonian.
22
Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box
Jens Koch, Terri M. Yu, Jay Gambetta et al. · Physical Review A · 2007 · 3.4K citations · Full text
Computing, Computer Science, Physics +16
Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance
R. Barends, J. Kelly, A. Megrant et al. · Nature · 2014 · 1.8K citations · Full text
Coupling superconducting qubits via a cavity bus
Johannes Majer, Jerry M. Chow, Jay Gambetta et al. · Nature · 2007 · 1.4K citations · Full text
Demonstration of two-qubit algorithms with a superconducting quantum processor
L. DiCarlo, Jerry M. Chow, Jay Gambetta et al. · Nature · 2009 · 1.2K citations · Full text
Coherent Josephson Qubit Suitable for Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits
R. Barends, J. Kelly, A. Megrant et al. · Physical Review Letters · 2013 · 790 citations · Full text