Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · 2016 · 191 citations · 26 references
Social SciencesCommunicationSocial PsychologyNonverbal CommunicationPersuasionPragmaticsAffective CommunicationSocial CommunicationVerbal CommunicationIntent AssessmentMessage ProductionNonverbal Emotional CuesSarcasm Understanding
Sarcasm is especially hard to interpret correctly in written communication. The study investigates whether emoticons can clarify message intent. Participants either clarified existing sentences or produced new ones, using emoticons to indicate intent. Tongue‑ and wink‑emoticons reliably indicate sarcasm, ellipsis signals criticism, and emoticons overall help clarify intent.
We present 2 studies that investigate the use of emoticons in clarifying message intent. We examine sarcasm in particular, which can be especially hard to interpret correctly in written communication. In both studies, participants were required to make the intentions of their messages clear. In the first, they clarified the meaning of existing sentences without altering the wording; in the second, they produced their own sentences. Results provided clear evidence that tongue and wink emoticons are the principal indicators of sarcastic intent, and that ellipsis is associated more with criticism, rather than with sarcasm. These findings highlight the significant role emoticons play in clarifying message intention, compensating for the absence of nonverbal cues in written communication.
26
J. A. Nelder, R. W. M. Wedderburn · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · 1972 · 7.2K citations
The problem of meaning in primitive languages
Bernadette Malinowski · Medical Entomology and Zoology · 1967 · 1.1K citations