American Political Science Review · 2015 · 158 citations · 60 references
Social SciencesGender StudiesInternational RelationsFeminist TheoryHuman RightsRights Of WomenFeminist MovementsFeminist Political TheoryGender EqualityLiberal FeminismFeminist Critique Of LiberalismFeminist Critiques Of LiberalismGender Equality DiscourseInternational Women's Human Rights LawWomen’s Human RightsWomen’s OppressionWomen’s Rights Movements
Feminisms differ in their explanations of women’s subordination, alternatives to patriarchy, and strategies for change. The article aims to critically examine how feminist theories interact with international human rights discourses at UN forums and documents. It analyzes UN forums and documents to assess the integration of feminist theories. The study finds that while diverse feminisms appear in some UN documents, the overall women’s rights approach remains dominated by liberal feminism, and that aggregate empowerment indicators obscure power dynamics and lead to misleading policy assumptions.
Although all theories that oppose the subordination of women can be called feminist, beyond this common denominator, feminisms vary in terms of what they see as the cause of women's subordination, alternatives to patriarchal society, and proposed strategies to achieve the desired change. This article offers a critical examination of the interaction of feminist theories and the international human rights discourses as articulated at the UN forums and documents. It contends that although a range of feminisms that elucidate the diversity of women's experiences and complexities of oppression have been incorporated into some UN documents, the overall women's rights approach of the UN is still informed by the demands and expectations of liberal feminism. This is particularly evident in the aggregate indicators that are employed to assess the “empowerment of women.” In addition to explaining why liberal feminism trumps other feminisms, the article addresses the problems with following policies that are informed by liberal feminism. Noting that the integrative approach of liberal feminism may establish gender equality without empowering the majority of women, it criticizes using aggregate indicators of empowerment for conflating sources of power with empowerment and making false assumptions.
60
Peter Bachrach, Morton S. Baratz · American Political Science Review · 1962 · 3.3K citations
Deniz Kandiyoti · Gender & Society · 1988 · 2.9K citations
Intersectionality and Feminist Politics
Nira Yuval‐Davis · European Journal of Women s Studies · 2006 · 2.4K citations · Full text
Creating capabilities: the human development approach
Choice Reviews Online · 2011 · 2.3K citations