IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · 2016 · 27 citations · 46 references
Natural SciencesPhysicsAcousticsComputational AcousticsPsychoacousticsAcoustic MeasurementArchitectural AcousticsRoom AcousticsSpeech AcousticsSpeech Perception In NoiseSpeech RecognitionAuditory Perception In ReverberationReverberation EffectsRoom Acoustics For SpeechRoom Acoustics MeasurementRoom Acoustics ModelingRoom Impulse ResponseRoom Impulse Response EstimationRoom Impulse Response Simulation
Several intrusive measures of reverberation can be computed from measured and simulated room impulse responses, over the full frequency band or for each individual mel-frequency subband. It is initially shown that full-band clarity index C <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">50</sub> is the most correlated measure on average with reverberant speech recognition performance. This corroborates previous findings but now for the dataset to be used in this study. We extend the previous findings to show that C <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">50</sub> also exhibits the highest mutual information on average. Motivated by these extended findings, a nonintrusive room acoustic (NIRA) estimation method is proposed to estimate C <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">50</sub> from only the reverberant speech signal. The NIRA method is a data-driven approach based on computing a number of features from the speech signal and it employs these features to train a model used to perform the estimation. The choice of features and learning techniques are explored in this work using an evaluation set which comprises approximately 100 000 different reverberant signals (around 93 h of speech) including reverberation from measured and simulated room impulse responses. The feature importance of each feature with respect to the estimation of the target C <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">50</sub> is analysed following two different approaches. In both cases, the newly chosen set of features shows high importance for the target. The best C <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">50</sub> estimator provides a root-mean-square deviation around 3 dB on average for all reverberant test environments.
46
Sepp Hochreiter, Jürgen Schmidhuber · Neural Computation · 1997 · 98.1K citations
Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting
Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey E. Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky et al. · 2014 · 34.3K citations
Classification and Regression Trees.
Alexander Gordon, Leo Breiman, Jerome H. Friedman et al. · Biometrics · 1984 · 23.9K citations
Wrappers for feature subset selection
Ron Kohavi, George H. John · Artificial Intelligence · 1997 · 8.9K citations