Translational Behavioral Medicine · 2016 · 231 citations · 44 references
Public HealthBehavioral SciencesKnowledge ManagementBehavior Change TheoryImplementation ScienceSoftware EngineeringAgile Software DevelopmentBehavior ChangeBehavior Change StrategiesBehavior Change SupportBehavioral ChangeBehavioral InterventionsAdaptive Intervention DesignBehavior Change EvaluationBehavior Change InterventionsBehavior Change ModelsBehavioral Intervention AdaptationDecision RulesEffect SizeKnowledge Base Evaluation
Evidence‑based practice is crucial for behavioral interventions, yet how to best support real‑world behavior change remains debated. This paper defines a set of products and a preliminary process for efficiently and adaptively creating and curating a knowledge base for real‑world behavior change. Drawing parallels to software development, the authors propose an agile science process with generation and evaluation phases that produce and assess operational definitions of three products—self‑contained modules, computational models, and personalization algorithms—while emphasizing early and frequent sharing. If successful, agile science could yield a more robust knowledge base for behavior change.
Evidence-based practice is important for behavioral interventions but there is debate on how best to support real-world behavior change. The purpose of this paper is to define products and a preliminary process for efficiently and adaptively creating and curating a knowledge base for behavior change for real-world implementation. We look to evidence-based practice suggestions and draw parallels to software development. We argue to target three products: (1) the smallest, meaningful, self-contained, and repurposable behavior change modules of an intervention; (2) "computational models" that define the interaction between modules, individuals, and context; and (3) "personalization" algorithms, which are decision rules for intervention adaptation. The "agile science" process includes a generation phase whereby contender operational definitions and constructs of the three products are created and assessed for feasibility and an evaluation phase, whereby effect size estimates/casual inferences are created. The process emphasizes early-and-often sharing. If correct, agile science could enable a more robust knowledge base for behavior change.
44
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
Peter Craig, Paul Dieppe, Sally MacIntyre et al. · BMJ · 2008 · 11.4K citations · Full text
Susan Michie, Michelle Richardson, Marie Johnston et al. · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · 2013 · 8K citations · Full text
How We Design Feasibility Studies
Deborah J. Bowen, Matthew W. Kreuter, Bonnie Spring et al. · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · 2009 · 3.8K citations · Full text
Paul Resnick, Hal R. Varian · Communications of the ACM · 1997 · 3.7K citations · Full text
A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization
Robert M. Bond, Christopher J. Fariss, Jason Jones et al. · Nature · 2012 · 2.6K citations
Social Sciences, Political Communication, Political Science +17