For avid glucose tumors, the SUV peak is the most reliable parameter for [18F]FDG-PET/CT quantification, regardless of acquisition time

Avigaëlle Sher, Franck Lacœuille, Pacôme Fosse, Laurent Vervueren, Aurélie Cahouet-Vannier, Djamel Dabli, Francis Bouchet, Olivier Couturier

EJNMMI Research · 2016 · 120 citations · 21 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study is an assessment of the impact of acquisition times on SUV with [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT on healthy livers (reference organ with stable uptake over time) and on tumors. METHODS: One hundred six [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT were acquired in list mode over a single-bed position (livers (n = 48) or on tumors (n = 58)). Six independent datasets of different durations were reconstructed (from 1.5 to 10 min). SUVmax (hottest voxel), SUVpeak (maximum average SUV within a 1-cm(3) spherical volume), and SUVaverage were measured within a 3-cm-diameter volume of interest (VOI) in the right lobe of the liver. For [(18)F]FDG avid tumors (SUVmax ≥ 5), the SUVmax, SUVpeak, and SUV41% (isocontour threshold method) were computed. RESULTS: For tumors, SUVpeak values did not vary with acquisition time. SUVmax displayed significant differences between 1.5- and 5-10-min reconstruction times. SUV41% was the most time-dependent parameter. For the liver, the SUVaverage was the sole parameter that did not vary over time. CONCLUSIONS: For [(18)F]FDG avid tumors, with short acquisition times, i.e., with new generations of PET systems, the SUVpeak may be more robust than the SUVmax. The SUVaverage over a 3-cm-diameter VOI in the right lobe of the liver appears to be a good method for a robust and reproducible assessment of the hepatic metabolism.

References

21