JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2016 · 126 citations · 38 references
PharmacyPharmacoeconomicsPharmacotherapyComparative Effectiveness ResearchCost-effectiveness AnalysisPharmacoeconomic ModelingCost-effectiveness ComparisonCost-effectiveness ModelingHealthcare Cost AnalysisMarkov ModelingPharmaceutical EconomicsPharmacoeconomic EvaluationChronic Myeloid Leukemia TherapyClinical Endpoint AssessmentClinical Endpoint EvaluationClinical Endpoint ModelingCost-effectivenessGeneric Drug EntryGeneric EntryMarkov Disease Models
BACKGROUND: We analyzed the cost-effectiveness of treating incident chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) with generic imatinib when it becomes available in United States in 2016. In the year following generic entry, imatinib's price is expected to drop 70% to 90%. We hypothesized that initiating treatment with generic imatinib in these patients and then switching to the other tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs), dasatinib or nilotinib, because of intolerance or lack of effectiveness ("imatinib-first") would be cost-effective compared with the current standard of care: "physicians' choice" of initiating treatment with any one of the three TKIs. METHODS: We constructed Markov models to compare the five-year cost-effectiveness of imatinib-first vs physician's choice from a US commercial payer perspective, assuming 3% annual discounting ($US 2013). The models' clinical endpoint was five-year overall survival taken from a systematic review of clinical trial results. Per-person spending on incident CML-CP treatment overall care components was estimated using Truven's MarketScan claims data. The main outcome of the models was cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). We interpreted outcomes based on a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY. A panel of European LeukemiaNet experts oversaw the study's conduct. RESULTS: Both strategies met the threshold. Imatinib-first ($277 401, 3.87 QALYs) offered patients a 0.10 decrement in QALYs at a savings of $88 343 over five years to payers compared with physician's choice ($365 744, 3.97 QALYs). The imatinib-first incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was approximately $883 730/QALY. The results were robust to multiple sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: When imatinib loses patent protection and its price declines, its use will be the cost-effective initial treatment strategy for CML-CP.
38
Five-Year Follow-up of Patients Receiving Imatinib for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Brian Druker, François Guilhot, Stephen G. O’Brien et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2006 · 3.5K citations · Full text
Medicine, Hematology, Oncology +13
Nilotinib versus Imatinib for Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Giuseppe Saglio, Dong‐Wook Kim, Surapol Issaragrisil et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2010 · 1.7K citations · Full text
François‐Xavier Mahon, Delphine Réa, Joëlle Guilhot et al. · The Lancet Oncology · 2010 · 1.5K citations