Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume · 2012 · 17 citations · 31 references
DentistryOral RadiologyBone GraftingImplant ImagingImplant SurgeryBone CementsCement IntegrityAugmented Glenoid ComponentsCement InfiltrationCement Layer ThicknessCementing
The aim of this study was to compare a third-generation cementing procedure for glenoid components with a new technique for cement pressurisation. In 20 pairs of scapulae, 20 keeled and 20 pegged glenoid components were implanted using either a third-generation cementing technique (group 1) or a new pressuriser (group 2). Cement penetration was measured by three-dimensional (3D) analysis of micro-CT scans. The mean 3D depth of penetration of the cement was significantly greater in group 2 (p < 0.001). The mean thickness of the cement mantle for keeled glenoids was 2.50 mm (2.0 to 3.3) in group 1 and 5.18 mm (4.4 to 6.1) in group 2, and for pegged glenoids it was 1.72 mm (0.9 to 2.3) in group 1 and 5.63 mm (3.6 to 6.4) in group 2. A cement mantle < 2 mm was detected less frequently in group 2 (p < 0.001). Using the cement pressuriser the proportion of cement mantles < 2 mm was significantly reduced compared with the third-generation cementing technique.
31
Glenoid loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty
Jonathan L. Franklin, William P. Barrett, Sarah E. Jackins et al. · The Journal of Arthroplasty · 1988 · 686 citations
Pascal Boileau, Cyril Avidor, Sumant G. Krishnan et al. · Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery · 2002 · 362 citations