Physical review. A/Physical review, A · 2016 · 19 citations · 19 references
Natural SciencesCommunicationPhysicsDiscriminationQuantum ComputingQuantum MechanicsQuantum BitsQuantum CommunicationQuantum EntanglementQuantum Information TheoryQuantum MeasurementQuantum StatesBipartite EntanglementEntangled StatesEntanglement TheoryEntanglement-based ProtocolsQuantum State DiscriminationQubit EntanglementQubit States
In this paper, the following scenario is considered: there are two qubits possessed by two parties at different locations. Qubits have been prepared in one of a maximum of four, mutually-orthogonal, entangled states and the parties wish to distinguish between the states by using local operations and classical communication. Although in general it is not possible to distinguish between four arbitrary states, the parties can spend some preshared entanglement to achieve perfect discrimination between four qubit states and can also preserve the entanglement of the states after discrimination. This is shown by employing the theory of majorization and the connections between entanglement transformations and state discrimination protocols.
19
Entanglement measures and purification procedures
Vlatko Vedral, Martin B. Plenio · Physical Review A · 1998 · 1.4K citations · Full text
Conditions for a Class of Entanglement Transformations
Michael A. Nielsen · Physical Review Letters · 1999 · 1.1K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Physics, Algebra +14
How to differentiate between non-orthogonal states
I D Ivanovic · Physics Letters A · 1987 · 720 citations
How to differentiate between non-orthogonal states
Asher Peres · Physics Letters A · 1988 · 714 citations