Multiple Sclerosis Journal · 2016 · 38 citations · 22 references
MedicineNeurologyRadiologyBiomedical ImagingDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyDemyelinating DiseasesDemyelinating DisordersMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple SclerosisNeurologic ImagingNeurological AssessmentCohen's Kappa InterpretationDiagnostic Accuracy StudiesDiagnostic Testing AccuracyInter-rater AgreementInter-rater ReliabilityInter-rater Reliability AssessmentInversion Recovery ContrastRater Agreement
Objective: To evaluate clinical fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR)* 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is sensitive to perivenular inflammatory demyelinating lesions, in diagnosing multiple sclerosis (MS). Background: Central veins may be a distinguishing feature of MS lesions. FLAIR*, a combined contrast derived from clinical MRI scans, has not been studied as a clinical tool for diagnosing MS. Methods: Two experienced MS neurologists evaluated 87 scan pairs (T 2 -FLAIR/FLAIR*), separately and side-by-side, from 68 MS cases, 8 healthy volunteers, and 11 individuals with other neurological diseases. Raters judged cases based on experience, published criteria, and a visual assessment of the “40% rule,” whereby MS is favored if >40% of lesions demonstrate a central vein. Diagnostic accuracy was determined with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and inter-rater reliability was assessed with Cohen’s kappa (κ). Results: Diagnostic accuracy was high: rater 1, AUC 0.94 (95% confidence interval: 0.89, 0.97) for T 2 -FLAIR, 0.95 (0.92, 0.98) for FLAIR*; rater 2, 0.94 (0.90, 0.98) and 0.90 (0.85, 0.95). AUC improved when images were considered together: rater 1, 0.99 (0.98, 1.00); rater 2, 0.98 (0.96, 0.99). Inter-rater agreement was substantial for T 2 -FLAIR (κ = 0.68) and FLAIR* (κ = 0.74), despite low agreement on the 40% rule (κ = 0.47) ([Formula: see text] in all cases). Conclusions: Joint clinical evaluation of T 2 -FLAIR and FLAIR* images modestly improves diagnostic accuracy for MS and does not require counting lesions with central veins.
22
Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald criteria
Chris H. Polman, Stephen C. Reingold, Brenda Banwell et al. · Annals of Neurology · 2011 · 9.8K citations · Full text
Medicine, Neurology, Neuroscience +10
New Multiple Sclerosis Phenotypic Classification
Fred Lublin · European Neurology · 2014 · 4.3K citations
Ultra-high-field imaging distinguishes MS lesions from asymptomatic white matter lesions
Emma Tallantyre, Jennifer Dixon, Ian Donaldson et al. · Neurology · 2011 · 217 citations · Full text
Distinct lesion morphology at 7-T MRI differentiates neuromyelitis optica from multiple sclerosis
Tim Sinnecker, Jan Dörr, Caspar F. Pfueller et al. · Neurology · 2012 · 216 citations
MR venography of multiple sclerosis.
I Leng Tan, Ronald A. van Schijndel, Petra J. W. Pouwels et al. · PubMed · 2000 · 202 citations · Full text