Health Services Research · 2016 · 94 citations · 21 references
ComputingComputer ScienceInsuranceMachine LearningPredictive AnalyticsStatistical LearningDecision TreesEnsemble LearningEnsemble MethodsRisk AdjustmentRisk EstimationRisk PredictionAdministrative Data SourcesHealth Plan Risk AdjustmentMachine Learning EstimationMachine Learning For InsuranceMachine Learning Prediction ModelsNonparametric EstimationRisk Adjustment In PaymentRisk Adjustment Methodology
The study aims to introduce a cross‑validated, nonparametric machine‑learning framework for plan payment risk adjustment and evaluate its potential to improve risk‑adjustment accuracy. Using 2011–2012 Truven MarketScan data, the authors compared regression, penalized regression, decision trees, neural networks, and an ensemble super learner—each coupled with variable‑screening algorithms—to predict annual expenditures from age, sex, geography, inpatient diagnoses, and hierarchical condition categories, assessing performance via cross‑validated R². The framework produced a simplified risk‑adjustment formula that retained most of the efficiency of larger traditional models, and the ensemble approach outperformed classical regression and all other algorithms, suggesting cross‑validated machine‑learning can improve risk adjustment while discouraging aggressive coding.
Objective To introduce cross‐validation and a nonparametric machine learning framework for plan payment risk adjustment and then assess whether they have the potential to improve risk adjustment. Data Sources 2011–2012 Truven MarketScan database. Study Design We compare the performance of multiple statistical approaches within a broad machine learning framework for estimation of risk adjustment formulas. Total annual expenditure was predicted using age, sex, geography, inpatient diagnoses, and hierarchical condition category variables. The methods included regression, penalized regression, decision trees, neural networks, and an ensemble super learner, all in concert with screening algorithms that reduce the set of variables considered. The performance of these methods was compared based on cross‐validated R 2 . Principal Findings Our results indicate that a simplified risk adjustment formula selected via this nonparametric framework maintains much of the efficiency of a traditional larger formula. The ensemble approach also outperformed classical regression and all other algorithms studied. Conclusions The implementation of cross‐validated machine learning techniques provides novel insight into risk adjustment estimation, possibly allowing for a simplified formula, thereby reducing incentives for increased coding intensity as well as the ability of insurers to “game” the system with aggressive diagnostic upcoding.
21
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team · 2000 · 353K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Computer Science, Statistical Computing +10
Classification and Regression by randomForest
Andy Liaw, Matthew C. Wiener · 2007 · 18.4K citations
Classification and regression trees
J. Praagman · European Journal of Operational Research · 1985 · 10.2K citations