Concepedia

TLDR

Understanding patients’ health‑related preferences can make care cheaper, more effective, and more aligned with individual desires, but requires patients to express preferences, clinicians to receive them at the point of care, and decision‑theory–based informatics tools to make these values actionable. The study aims to develop computer‑based tools that help clinicians integrate patient preferences with evidence, guidelines, and real‑world constraints. Computer‑based preference elicitation and reporting tools are found to be acceptable to both patients and clinicians.

Abstract

If nurses, physicians, and health care planners knew more about patients' health-related preferences, care would most likely be cheaper, more effective, and closer to the individuals' desires. In order for patient preferences to be effectively used in the delivery of health care, it is important that patients be able to formulate and express preferences, that these judgments be made known to the clinician at the time of care, and that these statements meaningfully inform care activities. Decision theory and health informatics offer promising strategies for eliciting subjective values and making them accessible in a clinical encounter in a manner that drives health choices. Computer-based elicitation and reporting tools are proving acceptable to patients and clinicians alike. It is time for the informatics community to turn their attention toward building computer-based applications that support clinicians in the complex cognitive process of integrating patient preferences with scientific knowledge, clinical practice guidelines, and the realities of contemporary health care.

References

YearCitations

Page 1