Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume · 1987 · 39 citations · 8 references
HumanitiesPhilosophySociologyContemporary PhilosophyFeminist TheoryWomen's StudiesFeminist EpistemologyFeminist EthicsFeminist PhilosophyNormative EthicsFemale MadnessMoral IntegrityMoral VoicePatriarchal IdeologyPatriarchal TheoryPhilosophical LiteratureSociological CriticismWomen In Ethics
Kathryn Morgan has introduced us to a typology of ‘the ways in which women’s moral voice and her sense of moral integrity are twisted and destroyed by patriarchal ideology and lived experience.’ She claims that this experience can induce in women ‘a sense of confusion and genuine moral madness.’ I am in agreement with much of what Morgan says. However, I suspect that some others might find her case less convincing than I for the reason that she supports her claims by an appeal to classical philosophical literature and what we might loosely call ‘sociological observations.’ One can imagine the easy retort—‘Yes, well, it’s true that Aristotle, Aquinas, Rousseau and Kant did say those silly things about women, but their remarks were mere asides and no one takes them seriously in this matter any more anyway.
8
The science question in feminism
Kristin Waters · Women s Studies International Forum · 1987 · 3.8K citations
Postures of the Mind: Essays on Mind and Morals.
Don Locke, Annette C. Baier · The Philosophical Quarterly · 1986 · 421 citations
Eunice Lipton, Susan Jacoby · The Women s Review of Books · 2000 · 259 citations
What do Women want in a Moral Theory?
Annette C. Baier · Noûs · 1985 · 212 citations
Rights and Goods: Justifying Social Action.
David Copp, Virginia Held · The Philosophical Review · 1988 · 132 citations
Humanities, Philosophy, Ethics +16