Publication | Open Access
Energy audit in small wastewater treatment plants: methodology, energy consumption indicators, and lessons learned
108
Citations
10
References
2015
Year
Sewage Sludge TreatmentEngineeringEnergy EfficiencyWastewater CollectionBiological Waste TreatmentEnergy AuditMunicipal WastewaterDetailed Energy AuditsWastewater TreatmentChemical EngineeringWater TreatmentEnergy AssessmentEnergy ConsumptionWastewater ManagementEnergy AuditingEnergy Consumption IndicatorsResource RecoveryWaste ManagementWater-energy NexusEnergy AuditsEnvironmental EngineeringLife Cycle Assessment
Energy audits of WWTPs show large stage‑to‑stage consumption differences that depend on the audit indicators used. This study develops a methodology for auditing small WWTPs and selects key energy‑consumption indicators for plant comparison and benchmarking. The authors distinguished hydraulic, COD, sludge, and building stages, performed detailed audits on five small WWTPs (<10,000 PE) using two years of continuous data, and analyzed each stage with different energy indicators. The audits revealed low capacity utilisation (≈52 %) and equipment oversizing that waste energy, identified inefficiencies in sludge recirculation and aerobic stabilization, confirmed that >75 % denitrification is achieved by intermittent aeration without mixed‑liquor recirculation, and highlighted the need for automation of lighting and heating controls.
Energy audits in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) reveal large differences in the energy consumption in the various stages, depending also on the indicators used in the audits. This work is aimed at formulating a suitable methodology to perform audits in WWTPs and identifying the most suitable key energy consumption indicators for comparison among different plants and benchmarking. Hydraulic-based stages, stages based on chemical oxygen demand, sludge-based stages and building stages were distinguished in WWTPs and analysed with different energy indicators. Detailed energy audits were carried out on five small WWTPs treating less than 10,000 population equivalent and using continuous data for 2 years. The plants have in common a low designed capacity utilization (52% on average) and equipment oversizing which leads to waste of energy in the absence of controls and inverters (a common situation in small plants). The study confirms that there are several opportunities for reducing energy consumption in small WWTPs: in addition to the pumping of influent wastewater and aeration, small plants demonstrate low energy efficiency in recirculation of settled sludge and in aerobic stabilization. Denitrification above 75% is ensured through intermittent aeration and without recirculation of mixed liquor. Automation in place of manual controls is mandatory in illumination and electrical heating.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1