Supreme Court Economic Review · 2006 · 38 citations · 170 references
LawComputer ScienceTort LawComputer SecurityNegligenceStrict LiabilityEnterprise LiabilityInternet GovernanceLiabilityConditional ImmunityImmunity In Tort LawMalware LiabilityOnline Service Provider LiabilityStrict Liability DefensesStrict Liability InfringementStrict Liability PrincipleTort Liability Immunity
Internet service providers are today largely immune from liability for their role in the creation and propagation of worms, viruses, and other forms of malicious computer code. In this essay, we question that state of affairs. Our purpose is not to weigh in on the details-for example, whether liability should sound in negligence or strict liability, or whether liability is in this instance best implemented by statute or via gradual common law development. Rather, our aim is to challenge the recent trend in the courts and Congress away from liability and toward complete immunity for Internet service providers. In our view, such immunity is difficult to defend on policy grounds and sharply inconsistent with conventional tort law principles. Internet service providers control the gateway through which Internet pests enter and reenter the public network. Service providers should therefore bear some responsibility not only for stopping malicious code, but also for helping to identify individuals who originate it.
170
A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics
Christine Jolls, Cass R. Sunstein, Richard H. Thaler · Stanford Law Review · 1998 · 1.2K citations · Full text
Cass R. Sunstein · Columbia Law Review · 1996 · 1.2K citations
Social Sciences, Social Psychology, Interpersonal Relationships +9