Physical Therapy · 1998 · 19 citations · 3 references
MedicineOncologyPharmacologyCancer PharmacologyComparative OncologyUltrasoundRadiobiological ConsiderationsUltrasound In OncologyControl Group DesignMatched Control GroupRodent Tumor ModelsTherapeutic Ultrasound TransducersTherapy-induced Growth InhibitionTumor Growth DynamicsTumor Growth MonitoringTumor Growth Rate
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A diagnosis of cancer is a contraindication for the use of therapeutic ultrasound (US). Continuous US applied to murine tumors has resulted in larger and heavier tumors compared with controls. We compared tumor growth using low-power continuous US and energy-matched pulsed US. SUBJECTS: Female C57BL/6 mice (N = 174) were used. METHODS: Animals received subcutaneous injections of methylcholanthrene tumor cells. The mice were randomly divided into three groups: 60 mice that received low-power continuous US for 5 minutes at 0.75 W/cm2 (LC US group), 63 mice that received pulsed US for 12.5 minutes at 1.5 W/cm2 (pulsed US group), and 51 mice that served as a control group. The LC and pulsed US groups received equal US energy. Both experimental groups received 10 treatments of 3-MHz US, which was applied directly over the tumor. The control group received identical handling but no US. After treatment, the tumors were excised, weighed, and measured. A one-way analysis of variance, followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc testing, was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Mean tumor weights (in grams) and volumes (in cubic millimeters) were 0.563 g and 564 mm3 for the LC US group, 0.560 g and 525 mm3 for the pulsed US group, and 0.516 g and 406 mm3 for the control group. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Reducing total US energy will result in less growth of murine tumors. When infusing equal energy, continuous and pulsed US will produce similar effects on tumor growth.
3
Ultrasound: evaluation of its mechanical and thermal effects.