Transportation research circular · 2000 · 52 citations · 2 references
Traffic TheoryEngineeringProject ManagementOperations ResearchPath DependenceTemporal DynamicManagementSystems EngineeringU.s. ConditionsTraffic SimulationTransportation EngineeringCritical Gap RatioReliabilityTraffic EngineeringCritical GapCivil EngineeringTemporal ComplexityBusinessCrisis ManagementRoad Traffic ControlTraffic Management
The 1997 update to the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) includes a new set of critical gap and follow-up time values calibrated based on the U.S. conditions. This paper is to present the detailed investigation on various factors affecting the critical gap and follow-up time, so that users can have a better understanding of the recommended critical gap and follow-up time values. The investigation was based on the comprehensive database established during the NCHRP 3-46 project, Capacity and Level of Service at Unsignalized Intersections. The paper first identifies various factors that might affect critical gap and follow-up time, such as intersection geometry, traffic movements, vehicle type, speed limits, and delay. Step-wise regression technique is then applied to identify the significance of these various factors. The relationship between critical gap and follow-up time values is also investigated. It is found that the major factors affecting critical gap and follow-up time include intersection geometry, vehicle type, approach grade, and traffic movements. While an independent set of follow-up time values are recommended, the follow-up time to critical gap ratio is found to be approximately 0.60, which has been reported in previous studies. The newly recommended set of critical gap and follow-up time values form the basis for the procedures for two-way stop-controlled intersections included in the 1997 update to the HCM and the 2000 HCM.
2