Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2007 · 16 citations · 0 references
MedicineHematologyOncologyChemotherapyHematologic OncologyMedical OncologyChemotherapy In Hematologic MalignanciesCombination ChemotherapyDose SchedulingHematologic Malignancy PharmacotherapyHematologic Malignancy TherapyB-cell Malignancy TherapyBortezomib TherapyBortezomib-based RegimensBortezomib-based TherapyChemotherapy Administration In LymphomaLymphoma ChemotherapyProteasome Inhibitor TherapyProteasome Inhibitors
8010 Background: Bortezomib is the first proteasome inhibitor that showed promising activity in hematologic malignancies. In Jan 2005, we initiated a phase II randomized trial to evaluate front-line R-CHOP + bortezomib in B lymphoma pts. Methods: 6 cycles of standard R-CHOP (d1=d21) were planned, pts were randomized between 2 schedules of bortezomib: arm A (d 1,4,8,11), arm B (d 1,8). For the first 24 pts (step1), bortezomib was administred at 1 mg/m 2 in arm A and 1.3 mg/m 2 in arm B. For the next 24 pts (step2), it was increased at 1.3 mg/m 2 and 1.6 mg/m 2 respectively. G-CSF and EPO supports were allowed. Primary endpoint was CR rate after 6 cycles. Results: The trial was closed in Apr 2006 after inclusion of 49 pts. Sex ratio M/F was 28 /21. Median age: 63 years [32–76]. Pathology: 4 Lymphoplasmocytic, 4 small lymphocyte, 8 MZL, 2 Malt, 11 FL , 7 FL with histological transformation, 4 Mantle cell and 9 DLBC without adverse factor. Performance status 2–4: 4 pts; stage 4: 33 pts; LDH>N: 16 pts and IPI 2–3: 18 pts. According to triangular-test interim analysis (Jan 2006), arm A was closed at 20 pts (11 step1, 9 step2). 29 pts received arm B (10 step1, 19 step2). 290 cycles of R- CHOP and 819 injections of bortezomid were given. In arm A, 5/20 pts received less than 90% of scheduled dose of bortezomib (all in step2); in arm B, 7/29 pts (2 step1 and 5 step2). Grade 3–4 thrombopenia occurred in 14% of cycles (35% arm A, 0% arm B, 14% step2), Grade 3–4 leucopenia in 41 % (35% arm A, 45% arm B, 43% step2). Neurological toxicity occurred in 21 pts: grade 2 in 11 (1 arm A, 10 arm B, 9 in step2) and grade 3–4 in 10 (5 arm A, 5 arm B, 9 in step 2). 6 of them were considered as serious adverse events. Other grade 3–4 toxicities were 1 constipation (1 arm B, step2), 3 infections (2 arm A, 1 arm B, 2 step 2) and 2 cardiac events (1 arm A, 1 arm B). 48 pts were evaluable for response: 40 achieved CR/CRU: 18/20 in arm A, 22/28 in arm B. There were 5 PR (1 arm A, 4 arm B), 1 SD (arm A) and 2 PD (arm B). 19/21 pts achieved CR in step 1 and 21/27 in step 2. After 1 year median follow up, OS was 100% and EFS 80%. Conclusions: R- CHOP+Bortezomid is an effective regimen with 83% CR rate. However, the higher doses of bortezomib lead to severe neuropathy and suggest that association with vinca alcaloides should be avoided. No significant financial relationships to disclose.