European Journal of Ophthalmology · 2015 · 12 citations · 19 references
MedicineOphthalmologySurgeryClinical Vision ScienceOphthalmic SurgeryRefractive SurgeryCataract ManagementCataract SurgeryContact Lens ComplicationsContact Lens SafetyLaser SurgerySoft Contact LensesCataract Surgery RatesFemtosecond Laser PulsesFemtosecond Laser UseLens InterfaceSoft Contact Lens Fitting
PURPOSE: To determine the safety of the Laser SoftFit™ patient interface by comparing intraoperative results with the contact interface of the LenSx® femtosecond laser platform (FSL). METHODS: In this nonrandomized, consecutive case series, 50 eyes underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) using the LenSx® laser platform (group 1); FLACS was performed in another 50 eyes, using the Laser SoftFit™ patient interface (group 2). Intraoperative complications (corneal folds) and surgical results (incomplete and free capsulotomies, incomplete phacofragmentation, and unopened incisions) were compared. RESULTS: Corneal folds and incomplete capsulotomies were less common (p = 0.0001 for both) and free-floating capsulotomies were more frequent (p = 0.0001) with the Laser SoftFit™ patient interface. Incomplete phacofragmentation and unopened incision exhibited similar rates in both groups (p = 0.436 and 0.204, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Using the Laser SoftFit™ patient interface decreased the incidence of corneal folds, resulting in better capsulotomy outcomes during FLACS.
19
The Lens Opacities Classification System III
L.T. Chylack · Archives of Ophthalmology · 1993 · 2.9K citations
Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation
Sverker Norrby · Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · 2008 · 656 citations
Medicine, Ophthalmology, Surgery +17