Publication | Open Access
Xyleborus saxeseni, its life-history and flight behaviour in New Zealand.
32
Citations
4
References
1973
Year
The biology of Xyleborus saxeseni (Ratz.) in New Zealand is described and compared with that reported from the Northern Hemisphere. The life cycle occupies a minimum of 8 weeks with emergence most probable between September and February. Brood size and sex ratio vary greatly with a high proportion of nests producing no males. The significance of virgin females in nest failure is discussed. In the central North Island two and possibly three generations occur annually. Emerging adults attack radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) logs one week after felling. Flight never occurred before noon. During mid-afternoon, provided that temperatures exceeded 21 °C beetles flew readily, but above 32 °C flight ceased. Following flight exercise the initially positive phototropic response of the beetles was reversed. Thirty-one indigenous and exotic tree species are recorded as hosts; the insect was very selective of the condition of host material it utilised. INTRODUCTION The ambrosia beetle X. saxeseni is recorded by Chararas (1962) as occurring throughout Europe, North Africa, Asia Minor, the Caucausus, and North America. Its establishment in New Zealand about 1957 (Milligan, 1969) has extended this range to the Southern Hemisphere. Field studies on the biology of X. saxeseni, which spanned three summers from August 1968 to April 1971 in Tauhara Forest, north of Lake Taupo, and experimental work at the Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, are reported in this paper. The most comprehensive study on X. saxeseni is that of Fischer (1954) who investigated its behaviour and its effect on apple trees in Germany. He describes in some detail the development of the nest system and suggests an evolutionary sequence of decreasing complexity in certain Scolytid gallery types. He considers the complicated forked galleries of Anisandrus dispa F. to be the most primitive, leading to the Xyleborus monographus type which is confined to a single growth ring. X. saxeseni with a single transverse gallery, he suggests, is the most advanced. He describes the activity of the female parent in nest initiation and outlines the pattern of brood development. He also discusses fertilisation, the fungal symbiont, and control of this insect in orchard trees. His literature review appears to be complete up to 1954. Chararas (1962) adds little information except to comment on the insect's significance N.Z. JI For. Sci. 3 (1): 37-53 38 New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science Vol. 3 in coniferous forests. The synonymy of the species is outlined by Chamberlin (1958) who also records several hardwood hosts in the United States of America. The most recent contribution concerning the biology of X. saxeseni, by Milligan (1969, 1970), discusses the first recorded instance of attack on sawn timber, and outlines the probable circumstances leading to the establishment of this species in New Zealand. He also summarises the beetle's biology as it was known in this country and its possible significance to forest industries. The distribution and spread of X. saxeseni in New Zealand (Fig. 1) is least confused in the South Island where one definite point of establishment is evident at Nelson. A second possible point is Dunedin, where a single infested tree was recorded. In the North Island, points of establishment are less clear but Coromandel and Wairakei both appear possibilities. Without a detailed survey it is not possible to determine the origin of infestations at Gisborne, Napier and New Plymouth. The host list for the Northern Hemisphere includes a wide range of hardwoods and softwoods (Blackman, 1922; Chamberlin, 1949, 1958; Chararas, 1962; Doane et al., 1936; Hopkins, 1898). In New Zealand attack has been recorded on 30 species of exotic and indigenous trees (Appendix 1), and has been confined to dead and dying trees. Infestations are often present in waste logs, stumps, and windthrown trees. No detailed studies have been made previously on the life history and habits of this beetle in coniferous trees. The observations recorded in this paper mainly concern broods in radiata pine. The literature contains few references to emergence patterns and daily flight activity of X. saxeseni. This paper deals with these aspects in some detail. Some mention is made of deviations in behaviour which might be attributed to the new environment. Estimation of the number of generations per year is complicated by the protracted emergence from many nests. As the summer period progresses the overlapping of successive generations makes observation of the offspring of overwintering broods impossible under field conditions. For this reason field observations were confined to the overwintering generation. MATERIALS AND METHODS In the field, cages were placed over active nests in the winter months and the emergence of brood was recorded at weekly intervals throughout the following summer. Emerged adults were sexed and the presence of frass or nest cleanings noted. When emergences had ceased, logs containing caged nests were cut into billets and each nest was dissected to determine the size and complexity of the brood chamber and to count the brood which had failed to emerge. The emergence cages were small, transparent, plastic pill-boxes with a hole the same diameter as an X. saxeseni entry tunnel, drilled at the centre point of the base (Fig. 2). They were attached by a rubber based adhesive to debarked logs. Cages were placed over 350 active nests in the course of the study. Infested material collected by the writer, and that forwarded by the Forest Biology Survey, was dissected as it came to hand and details of host species, brood, and extent of damage were recorded. To determine how soon damage could be expected in logs after felling, three freshly cut logs 1.5 m long were placed in the Tauhara Forest study area at weekly No. 1 Hqsking — Xyleborus saxeseni 39 FIG. 1—The distribution of Xyleborus saxeseni in New Zealand, February 1972. 40 New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science Vol. 3 FIG. 2—Xyleborus saxeseni field traps in place with tops removed. intervals throughout the 1968-69 summer. Attacks were recorded weekly and at the end of the emergence period the logs were dissected. A hygrothermograph gave a continuous record of temperature and relative humidity in the study area during the 1968-69 and 1969-70 emergence seasons. The small size of the adults precluded any attempts at field observations of flight activity. Studies on this aspect of its behaviour were made in an insectary with free air movement and light penetration through nylon screen cloth. During the period of flight activity, temperature, relative humidity, and light intensity were recorded at 15 minute intervals. Counts of insects in flight and on areas of screen cloth selected with regard to light intensity were made on the same time scale. The area to which the data of Fig. 6 apply was subject to highest light intensity. No. 1 Hosking — Xyleboms saxeseni 41 Adults in flight were counted visually by means of a simple grid while they hovered near the insectary ceiling. Counts made by three observers when approximately 200 insects were flying agreed within ± 2.5%. Observations were made on consecutive days whenever flight activity was evident. Radiata pine logs felled 3 weeks earlier were provided in the insectary so that nest initiation following flight could be observed. The presence of host material may also have helped simulate more closely field conditions. The insects studied emerged from six heavily infested Knightia excelsa logs. Flight observations were made over two summer periods, 1969-70 and 1970-71.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1