Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · 2010 · 22 citations · 30 references
MedicineOrthopaedic SurgeryOrthopedic SurgeryEvidence-based PracticeOrthopedicsOutcomes ResearchClinical Trial EthicsClinical TrialsRandomized Comparative TrialsRandomized Controlled TrialsStudy DesignTreatment EffectivenessAccess To Trial TreatmentsRandomized Clinical TrialsSample Size CalculationSample Size EstimationTreatment Effectiveness AnalysisTreatment Effectiveness Measurement
Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) generally provide the highest quality and least biased evidence for treatment effectiveness. Relatively few high-quality RCTs have been published in the orthopaedic literature. Barriers to increasing the quantity of trials include the orthopaedic culture, patient preferences, and the availability of treatment outside trials. Challenges to conducting better quality trials include sample size, random allocation, and blinding. Undertaking more high-quality trials can improve the evidence available for determining treatment effectiveness, resulting in better patient care.
30
Surgical versus Nonsurgical Therapy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
James N. Weinstein, Tor D. Tosteson, Jon D. Lurie et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2008 · 1.2K citations · Full text
Surgical vs Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disk Herniation
James N. Weinstein, Tor D. Tosteson, Jon D. Lurie et al. · JAMA · 2006 · 1.1K citations · Full text