PubMed · 2015 · 68 citations · 22 references
MedicineAnesthesiologySurgeryAnesthesiaAnesthetic TechniquesRegional AnesthesiaSedation During VentilationThoracic SurgeryLaryngeal Mask Airway UseNon-intubated Thoracic SurgeryParavertebral Nerve BlockThoracic Epidural Anesthesia
BACKGROUND: A survey amongst the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) members has been performed to investigate the currents trends, rates of adoption as well as potential for future expansion of non-intubated thoracic surgery (NITS) performed under spontaneous ventilation. METHODS: A 14-question-based questionnaire has been e-mailed to ESTS members. To facilitate the completion of the questionnaire, questions entailed either quantitative or multiple-choice answers. Investigated issues included previous experience with NITS and number of procedures performed, preferred types of anesthesia protocols (i.e., thoracic epidural anesthesia, intercostal or paravertebral blocks, laryngeal mask, use of additional sedation), type of procedures, ideal candidates for NITS, main advantages and technical disadvantages. Non-univocal answer to multiple-choice questions was permitted. RESULTS: Out of 105 responders, 62 reported an experience with NITS. The preferred types of anesthesia were intercostal blocks with (59%) or without (50%) sedation, followed by laryngeal mask with sedation (43%) and thoracic epidural anesthesia with sedation (20%). The most frequently performed procedures included thoracoscopic management of recurrent pleural effusion (98%), pleural decortication for empyema thoracis and lung biopsy for interstitial lung disease (26% each); pericardial window and mediastinal biopsy (20% each). More complex procedures such as lobectomy, lung volume reduction surgery and thymectomy have been performed by a minority of responders (2% each). Poor-risk patients due to co-morbidities (70%) and patients with poor pulmonary function (43%) were considered the ideal candidates. Main advantages included faster, recovery (67%), reduced morbidity (59%) and shorter hospital stay with decreased costs (43% each). Reported technical disadvantages included coughing (59%) and poor maneuverability due to diaphragmatic and lung movements (56%). Overall, 69% of responders indicated that NITS procedures will be likely to increase in the near future. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this survey, suggest that NITS is already quite widely adopted by ESTS members to perform simple thoracoscopic procedures. A future expanded adoption of this strategy is also hypothesized.
22
Feasibility and Results of Awake Thoracoscopic Resection of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules
Eugenio Pompeo, Davide Mineo, Paola Rogliani et al. · The Annals of Thoracic Surgery · 2004 · 263 citations · Full text
Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonology +10
Nonintubated Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer
Jin‐Shing Chen, Ya‐Jung Cheng, Ming‐Hui Hung et al. · Annals of Surgery · 2011 · 227 citations
Medicine, Anesthesiology, Surgery +14