Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances

TLDR

Relic abundance calculations, a standard tool for assessing dark‑matter candidates, can fail in three documented scenarios: when a nearly degenerate partner shares a quantum number, when the relic lies near a mass threshold, and when annihilation occurs near a cross‑section pole. The additional particle must be included in the reaction network, since its annihilation can control the relic abundance. We find that standard relic‑abundance calculations fail in three documented cases: when a nearly degenerate partner shares a quantum number, when annihilation into slightly heavier states dominates for mass differences of 5–15 %, and when annihilation occurs near a cross‑section pole, where proper thermal averaging shows a much shallower dip than previously expected.

Abstract

The calculation of relic abundances of elementary particles by following their annihilation and freeze-out in the early Universe has become an important and standard tool in discussing particle dark-matter candidates. We find three situations, all occurring in the literature, in which the standard methods of calculating relic abundances fail. The first situation occurs when another particle lies near in mass to the relic particle and shares a quantum number with it. An example is a light squark with neutralino dark matter. The additional particle must be included in the reaction network, since its annihilation can control the relic abundance. The second situation occurs when the relic particle lies near a mass threshold. Previously, annihilation into particles heavier than the relic particle was considered kinematically forbidden, but we show that if the mass difference is \ensuremath{\sim}5-15%, these "forbidden" channels can dominate the cross section and determine the relic abundance. The third situation occurs when the annihilation takes place near a pole in the cross section. Proper treatment of the thermal averaging and the annihilation after freeze-out shows that the dip in relic abundance caused by a pole is not nearly as sharp or deep as previously thought.