Operative Neurosurgery · 2015 · 37 citations · 22 references
MedicineNeurological SurgerySurgeryDiagnostic ImagingNeuro-oncologySurgical OncologyBrain ImagingBrain TumorsMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuro-oncologic ImagingNeuro-oncology ImagingFluorescence-guided SurgeryGlioma SurgeryImage-guided ResectionImage-guided SurgeryIntraoperative Magnetic Resonance ImagingKarnofsky Performance StatusPostoperative Residual Tumor AssessmentResidual Tumor Evaluation
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard among image-guided techniques for glioma surgery. Scant data are available on the role of intraoperative computed tomography (i-CT) in high-grade glioma (HGG) surgery. OBJECTIVE: To verify the technical feasibility and usefulness of portable i-CT in image-guided surgical resection of HGGs. METHODS: This is a retrospective series control analysis of prospectively collected data. Twenty-five patients (Group A) with HGGs underwent surgery using i-CT and 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) fluorescence. A second cohort of 25 patients (Group B) underwent 5-ALA fluorescence-guided surgery but without i-CT. We used a portable 8-slice CT scanner and, in both groups, neuronavigation. Extent of tumor resection (ETOR) and pre- and postoperative Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scores were measured; the impact of i-CT on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was also analyzed. RESULTS: In 8 patients (32%) in Group A, i-CT revealed residual tumor, and in 4 of them it helped to also resect pathological tissue detached from the main tumor. EOTR in these 8 patients was 97.3% (96%-98.6%). In Group B, residual tumor was found in 6 patients, whose tumor's mean resection was 98% (93.5-99.7). The Student t test did not show statistically significant differences in EOTR in the 2 groups. The KPS score decreased from 67 to 69 after surgery in Group A and from 74 to 77 in Group B (P = .07 according to the Student t test). Groups A and B did not show statistically significant differences in OS and PFS (P = .61 and .46, respectively, by the log-rank test). CONCLUSION: No statistically significant differences in EOTR, KPS, PFS, and OS were observed in the 2 groups. However, i-CT helped to verify EOTR and to update the neuronavigator with real-time images, as well as to identify and resect pathological tissue in multifocal tumors. i-CT is a feasible and effective alternative to intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Portable i-CT can provide useful real-time information during brain surgery and can be easily introduced in neurosurgical theaters in daily practice.
22
An extent of resection threshold for newly diagnosed glioblastomas
Nader Sanai, Mei‐Yin C. Polley, Michael W. McDermott et al. · Journal of neurosurgery · 2011 · 1.6K citations
Medicine, Neurosurgery, Surgery +17