PubMed · 2015 · 84 citations · 22 references
MedicineBiostatisticsOncologyCancer ImmunologySurvival AnalysisTumor ImmunologyBiomarkers In Urologic OncologyCancer BiomarkersImmuno-oncology BiomarkersKidney CancerPrognostic AssessmentRenal Cell CarcinomaDisease-specific SurvivalPd-l1 BlockadePrognostic Marker EvaluationProgrammed Cell Death Protein 1 (Pd-1) PathwayProgrammed Death-ligand 1 BiomarkerProgrammed Death-ligand 1 SignalingRenal Cell Carcinoma BiomarkersTnm Staging System
BACKGROUND: Recently, the association of immunological checkpoint marker programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and the prognosis of various cancers has always been a research hotspot. The objective of this study is to assess the clinical value of PD-L1 as a novel prognostic biomarker of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library databases and Grey literature were searched up to 30 March 2015 for eligible studies of the association between PD-L1 expression and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in RCC. The risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated from the included studies. Moreover, the odds ratio (OR) was also extracted to evaluate the association between the clinicopathological parameters of participants and PDL1 expression. RESULTS: Five studies involving 1073 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that positive/higher PD-L1 expression was a negative predictor for CSS with RR of 2.90 (95% CI: 1.64-5.13; Pheterogeneity. ≤ 0.001). Additionally, increased PD-L1 was found to be significantly associated with large tumor size (OR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.61-3.23; Pheterogeneity. = 0.645), high TNM stage (OR = 4.37, 95% CI: 2.99-6.39; Pheterogeneity. = 0.676), poor nuclear grade (OR = 7.58, 95% CI: 5.26-10.92; Pheterogeneity. = 0.203) and present tumor necrosis (OR = 6.77, 95% CI: 4.73-9.71; Pheterogeneity. = 0.111) in renal cell carcinoma patients. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis suggested that PD-L1 could act as a significant biomarker in the worse prognosis and adverse clinicopathologic features of renal cell carcinoma.
22
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
Rebecca DerSimonian, Nan M. Laird · Controlled Clinical Trials · 1986 · 39.3K citations
Rebecca L. Siegel, Kimberly D. Miller, Ahmedin Jemal · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2015 · 11.9K citations · Full text
Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis
Jayne F. Tierney, Lesley Stewart, Davina Ghersi et al. · Trials · 2007 · 6.4K citations · Full text