Economics and Philosophy · 2015 · 12 citations · 10 references
BusinessSocial PsychologyBehavioral EconomicsBusiness EthicsMoral PsychologyMoral HazardMoral Hazard AssessmentMoral ResponsibilitySocial VulnerabilityAbusive ExploitationExploitative ConductVulnerability
Abstract: According to some accounts of exploitation, most notably Ruth Sample’s (2003) degradation-based account and Robert Goodin’s (1987) vulnerability-based account, exploitation occurs when an advantaged party fails to constrain their advantage in light of another’s disadvantage, regardless of the cause of this disadvantage. Because the duty of constraint in these accounts does not depend on the cause of the disadvantage, the advantaged’s duty of constraint is what I call a ‘come-what-may’ duty. I show that come-what-may duties create moral hazards that can themselves be exploited by the disadvantaged parties. In such cases these accounts of exploitation are either self-frustrating or over-demanding.
10
CAPABILITIES AS FUNDAMENTAL ENTITLEMENTS: SEN AND SOCIAL JUSTICE
Martha C. Nussbaum · Feminist Economics · 2003 · 2.5K citations
Equal Opportunity or Equal Social Outcome?
Marc Fleurbaey · Economics and Philosophy · 1995 · 391 citations
Exploitation: what it is and why it's wrong
Choice Reviews Online · 2004 · 270 citations
Law, Criminology, Globalization +15
A Liberal Theory of Exploitation
Hillel Steiner · Ethics · 1984 · 160 citations
Modern theories of exploitation
Andrew Reeve · 1987 · 157 citations