PubMed · 2001 · 22 citations · 49 references
DentistryImplant DentistryProsthodonticsDental MaterialsMechanical Properties Of Dental MaterialsProstheticsBone CementsCement-retained ProsthesesCement-retained RestorationsDental CementsScrew-retained ProsthesesScrew-retained RestorationsAccuracyAngular DistortionControl Group DesignDimensional AccuracyMatched Control GroupRetentive StrengthTelescopic DevicesTensile Strength
The purpose of this research project was to compare the fit of a retrievable cement-retained implant-supported framework to that of a traditional wax and cast, screw-retained framework and to test the strength of the cemented restoration. Ten telescopic frameworks were luted to gold cylinders with a bis-GMA resin cement. The control group consisted of 10 frameworks fabricated with traditional wax and casting techniques directly to the gold cylinders. Frameworks were analyzed for distortion in the z-axis using scanning electron microscopy and a single screw test. Results demonstrated that the retrievable cement-retained group had a decreased gap distance and improved angular distortion (statistical significance P < .01) compared to the control group. Retentive strength measurements for the cement-retained group with a direct pull-out test revealed a mean pull-out force of 65.7 kg. Three of the 5 samples surpassed the tensile strength of the gold retaining screws (76 kg). Cement-retained restorations demonstrated superior fit in the z-axis and angular distortion compared to traditional wax and cast screw-retained frameworks. Retentive tests support a simplified technique of clinically luting telescopic implant-supported frameworks with adequate retentive strength.
49
Forces and moments on Branemark implants.
Bo Rangert, Torsten Jemt, L Jörnéus · PubMed · 1989 · 624 citations
Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients.
Torsten Jemt, K Book · PubMed · 1996 · 330 citations