Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors · 2013 · 10 citations · 27 references
ComputingComputer ScienceRadiologyBiomedical ImagingDiagnostic ImagingMachine LearningEnsemble MethodsImage SegmentationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMedical ImagingSemi-supervised LearningUnsupervised LearningPixel-wise ClassificationSemi-supervised ClassificationSemi-supervised Ensemble LearningSemi-supervised ModelsSemi-supervised SegmentationTissue SegmentationUnsupervised Learning For SegmentationUnsupervised Segmentation
Brain magnetic resonance images (MRIs) tissue segmentation is one of the most important parts of the clinical diagnostic tools. Pixel classification methods have been frequently used in the image segmentation with two supervised and unsupervised approaches up to now. Supervised segmentation methods lead to high accuracy, but they need a large amount of labeled data, which is hard, expensive, and slow to obtain. Moreover, they cannot use unlabeled data to train classifiers. On the other hand, unsupervised segmentation methods have no prior knowledge and lead to low level of performance. However, semi-supervised learning which uses a few labeled data together with a large amount of unlabeled data causes higher accuracy with less trouble. In this paper, we propose an ensemble semi-supervised frame-work for segmenting of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tissues that it has been used results of several semi-supervised classifiers simultaneously. Selecting appropriate classifiers has a significant role in the performance of this frame-work. Hence, in this paper, we present two semi-supervised algorithms expectation filtering maximization and MCo_Training that are improved versions of semi-supervised methods expectation maximization and Co_Training and increase segmentation accuracy. Afterward, we use these improved classifiers together with graph-based semi-supervised classifier as components of the ensemble frame-work. Experimental results show that performance of segmentation in this approach is higher than both supervised methods and the individual semi-supervised classifiers.
27
Advances in neural information processing systems 7
Krzysztof J. Cios, Mark E. Shields · Neurocomputing · 1997 · 22.3K citations
Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training
Avrim Blum, Tom M. Mitchell · 1998 · 5.6K citations · Full text
Semi-Supervised Learning Literature Survey
Xiaojin Zhu · Minds at UW (University of Wisconsin) · 2005 · 3.9K citations · Full text
Learning with Local and Global Consistency
Dengyong Zhou, Olivier Bousquet, Thomas Navin Lal et al. · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · 2003 · 3.8K citations · Full text