Maintenance venom immunotherapy administered at a 3-month interval preserves safety and efficacy and improves adherence.

E. Cavallucci, Shweta Ramondo, Attilio D. Renzetti, Maria Costanza Turi, Fisher Claudio, Manoela F.B. Braga, Cristoforo Incorvaia, Cosima Schiavone, Enzo Ballone, Mario Di Gioacchino

PubMed · 2010 · 34 citations · 17 references

Concepts

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy (VIT) is a safe and effective approach to insect sting allergy. However, after discontinuation, relapses can occur in some patients, especially those with a high occupational risk, and they may need to prolong VIT indefinitely. In order to improve adherence, we propose extending the interval between injections of maintenance VIT (MVIT). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and patient acceptance of a 3-month interval between MVIT injections in a group of Hymenoptera-allergic patients who are occupationally exposed to insect stings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 72 patients with severe systemic reactions to Hymenoptera stings. MVIT was administered for 4 years at intervals increasing up to 3 months and then continued for a further 2 years. Patients were informed of the risk of relapse after discontinuation and of the need for indefinite treatment at 3-month intervals. RESULTS: During the 3-month interval maintenance phase, only 235 local reactions (17.8%) were observed in 17 patients. Sixty patients experienced 125 field re-stings and only 1 experienced a systemic reaction with generalized urticaria. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms that the conventional MVIT interval of 4 to 6 weeks can be extended to 3 months in most patients with no adverse events, while maintaining safety and efficacy, improving adherence, and guaranteeing safe continuation of professional activity.

References

17