The Bryologist · 2007 · 155 citations · 126 references
Life SciencesBotanyEvolutionary BiologyBryologyPhylogeneticsPlant EvolutionBryophyte AnatomyBryophyte EvolutionBryophyte MorphologyBryophyte PhylogenyBryophyte SystematicsBryophyte TaxonomyComparative Morphology Of Extant BryophytesEvolution Of Body PlansHornwort EvolutionLeafy LiverwortsLiverwort PhylogenyMorphological PhylogenyPlant Evolutionary HistoryThalloid Liverworts
Molecular phylogenetics and expanded ultrastructural data have reshaped bryophyte relationships, challenging long‑held views on liverwort, hornwort, and moss evolution. This review aims to integrate contemporary morphological knowledge with novel molecular hypotheses and outline future research directions in bryophyte evolution. The authors review progress since the 1999 International Botanical Congress, discuss interrelationships and divergent taxa, and re‑evaluate key cellular and ultrastructural traits across bryophytes.
Revolutionary new concepts of bryophyte relationships have emerged from molecular phylogenetic analyses conducted since the onset of the 21st century. For example, sequence data contradict the historical notion that isophylly in leafy liverworts is plesiomorphic and that simple thalloid liverworts are monophyletic. Also contrary to traditional views are the concepts that Leiosporoceros is genetically distinct from other hornworts and that Oedipodium is sister to the peristomate mosses. Substantial increases in ultrastructural and anatomical data likewise have provided new insights on interrelationships. Because of this recent deluge in evolutionary studies on bryophytes, it is an opportune time to co-examine contemporary morphological knowledge and novel molecular hypotheses. An understanding of bryophyte evolution and biology is essential to identify structural innovations that accompanied early land colonization and to illuminate the evolution of more complicated body plans in tracheophytes. In this review, we examine the progress that has been made since the 1999 International Botanical Congress in clarifying the evolutionary history of the three groups of bryophytes. The state of our knowledge on interrelationships is discussed, with poorly-known, genetically divergent taxa illustrated for each group. Our review of bryophyte evolution includes a reëvaluation of the evolution of sperm cells, sporogenesis, stomata, symbioses, conducting cells and chloroplast ultrastructure in hornworts. We explore the prospects for future discoveries and advances with an emphasis on fundamental evolutionary problems that remain and the challenges that must be met to resolve them.
126
The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes
Yin‐Long Qiu, Jung-Ho Lee, Fabiana Bernasconi‐Quadroni et al. · Nature · 1999 · 869 citations
The Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory
Leo Francis Koch · The Bryologist · 1955 · 782 citations
Life Sciences, Biology, Botany +3
Horsetails and ferns are a monophyletic group and the closest living relatives to seed plants
Kathleen M. Pryer, Harald Schneider, Alan Р. Smith et al. · Nature · 2001 · 648 citations
Life Sciences, Botany, Plant Biology +16
Fragments of the earliest land plants
Charles H. Wellman, Peter Osterloff, Uzma Mohiuddin · Nature · 2003 · 603 citations