Publication | Open Access
Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE Statement
186
Citations
96
References
2009
Year
Genetic AssociationsGenome-wide Association StudyGenetic TestingGenotype-phenotype AssociationMedicineGeneticsGenetic EpidemiologyClinical GeneticsStrobe StatementStatistical GeneticsGenetic FoundationGenetic VariationPublic HealthGenetic Association StudiesApplied Genetic EpidemiologyEpidemiologyGenome-wide Association StudiesPublic Health Genetics
Rapidly evolving genetic association evidence is essential for genomics and medicine, yet inadequate reporting hampers synthesis of its strengths and weaknesses. STREGA extends the STROBE checklist with 12 additional items to improve transparency of genetic association study reporting without prescribing study design. STREGA adds 12 items to the STROBE checklist covering population stratification, genotyping errors, haplotype modeling, Hardy‑Weinberg equilibrium, replication, participant selection, gene/variant rationale, quantitative trait treatment effects, statistical methods, relatedness, descriptive and outcome data reporting, and data volume considerations.
Making sense of rapidly evolving evidence on genetic associations is crucial to making genuine advances in human genomics and the eventual integration of this information in the practice of medicine and public health. Assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of this evidence, and hence the ability to synthesize it, has been limited by inadequate reporting of results. The STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA) initiative builds on the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement and provides additions to 12 of the 22 items on the STROBE checklist. The additions concern population stratification, genotyping errors, modeling haplotype variation, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, replication, selection of participants, rationale for choice of genes and variants, treatment effects in studying quantitative traits, statistical methods, relatedness, reporting of descriptive and outcome data, and the volume of data issues that are important to consider in genetic association studies. The STREGA recommendations do not prescribe or dictate how a genetic association study should be designed but seek to enhance the transparency of its reporting, regardless of choices made during design, conduct, or analysis.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1