2014 · 13 citations · 12 references
ComputingComputer ScienceComputational LinguisticsNatural Language ProcessingSyntaxError CorrectionGrammarMachine TranslationAutomated Translation EvaluationError CategorizationGrammatical Error CorrectionStatistical Machine TranslationTranslation Accuracy EvaluationTranslation Quality Metrics
In this paper, we propose two enhancements to a statistical machine translation based approach to grammar correction for correcting all error categories. First, we propose tuning the SMT systems to optimize a metric more suited to the grammar correction task (F- score) rather than the traditional BLEU metric used for tuning language translation tasks. Since the F- score favours higher precision, tuning to this score can potentially improve precision. While the results do not indicate improvement due to tuning with the new metric, we believe this could be due to the small number of grammatical errors in the tuning corpus and further investigation is required to answer the question conclusively. We also explore the combination of custom-engineered grammar correction techniques, which are targeted to specific error categories, with the SMT based method. Our simple ensemble methods yield improvements in recall but decrease the precision. Tuning the custom-built techniques can help in increasing the overall accuracy also.
12
Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd J. Ward et al. · 2001 · 21.5K citations · Full text
The CoNLL-2014 Shared Task on Grammatical Error Correction
Hwee Tou Ng, Siew Mei Wu, Ted Briscoe et al. · 2014 · 587 citations · Full text
Better Evaluation for Grammatical Error Correction
Daniel Dahlmeier, Hwee Tou Ng · 2012 · 302 citations