Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques · 2002 · 30 citations · 5 references
MedicineSurgeryGeneral SurgeryPerioperative Quality ImprovementSurgical InstrumentationLaparoscopic SurgeryMinimally Invasive SurgeryAbdominal AdhesionsAdhesionsHospital Stay DurationLaparoscopic CholecystectomyPatient Satisfaction AnalysisPatient Satisfaction EvaluationPostoperative Analgesia After Abdominal SurgeryPostoperative Length Of Stay
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been reported to be safe and feasible with a higher patient satisfaction score. However, it was technically difficult even in expert hands because of the small operating field. We have modified the operating telescope to achieve a wide field of view. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since September 2000, 14 patients have been enrolled for two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The male to female ratio was 5:9. The median age was 54.5 years (interquartile range [IQR] 45-67.75 years). RESULTS: The median operative time was 53 minutes (IQR 38-61 minutes). Two patients required one additional 5-mm port or a traction suture because of dense adhesions. There was no conversion to open surgery. The median postoperative hospital stay was 2 days (IQR 1-2.25 days). The median oral postoperative analgesia requirement was 1 dose (IQR 0-3 doses). There were no major or minor complications, and there were no deaths. CONCLUSION: The modified two-port technique greatly facilitates two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and improves the clinical outcome.
5
Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy
P. L. Leggett, R. Churchman-Winn, Gary J. Miller · Surgical Endoscopy · 2000 · 129 citations
Nursing, Surgery, General Surgery +10
Pain after microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy
Thue Bisgaard, Birthe Klarskov, Rete Trap et al. · Surgical Endoscopy · 2000 · 97 citations
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Two-Port Technique
Ka-Ming Leung, K. W. Lee, T. Y. Cheung et al. · Endoscopy · 1996 · 48 citations
Medicine, Surgery, General Surgery +12