Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · 2015 · 57 citations · 46 references
ComputingBiomedical InformaticsHealth InformaticsClinical Decision SupportPredictive AnalyticsRecommender SystemsClinical Decision Support SystemsDecision Support In HealthcareEvaluation Of Recommender SystemsPatient-specific Recommendation SystemsRecommendation SystemsRisk PredictionClinical Data MiningClinical Decision Support ModelsClinical Decision Support ToolsElectronic Health Record Based RecommendationElectronic Health Record PredictionElectronic Health Record Prediction ModelsElectronic Medical RecordsEncounter Data Analysis
OBJECTIVE: To answer a "grand challenge" in clinical decision support, the authors produced a recommender system that automatically data-mines inpatient decision support from electronic medical records (EMR), analogous to Netflix or Amazon.com's product recommender. MATERIALS AND METHODS: EMR data were extracted from 1 year of hospitalizations (>18K patients with >5.4M structured items including clinical orders, lab results, and diagnosis codes). Association statistics were counted for the ∼1.5K most common items to drive an order recommender. The authors assessed the recommender's ability to predict hospital admission orders and outcomes based on initial encounter data from separate validation patients. RESULTS: Compared to a reference benchmark of using the overall most common orders, the recommender using temporal relationships improves precision at 10 recommendations from 33% to 38% (P < 10(-10)) for hospital admission orders. Relative risk-based association methods improve inverse frequency weighted recall from 4% to 16% (P < 10(-16)). The framework yields a prediction receiver operating characteristic area under curve (c-statistic) of 0.84 for 30 day mortality, 0.84 for 1 week need for ICU life support, 0.80 for 1 week hospital discharge, and 0.68 for 30-day readmission. DISCUSSION: Recommender results quantitatively improve on reference benchmarks and qualitatively appear clinically reasonable. The method assumes that aggregate decision making converges appropriately, but ongoing evaluation is necessary to discern common behaviors from "correct" ones. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative filtering recommender algorithms generate clinical decision support that is predictive of real practice patterns and clinical outcomes. Incorporating temporal relationships improves accuracy. Different evaluation metrics satisfy different goals (predicting likely events vs. "interesting" suggestions).
46
2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure
Clyde W. Yancy, Mariell Jessup, Biykem Bozkurt et al. · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2013 · 12.6K citations
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
BMJ · 2001 · 10.8K citations
Nazzareno Galiè, Marius M. Hoeper, Marc Humbert et al. · European Heart Journal · 2009 · 3.9K citations · Full text