2014 · 50 citations · 46 references
ComputingComputer ScienceComputational LinguisticsNatural Language ProcessingTranslation TheoryGrammarMachine TranslationTranslation Quality AssessmentClassification System EvaluationGrammatical Error AnalysisGrammatical Error CorrectionSentence Error CorrectionStatistical Machine TranslationTranslation Accuracy Evaluation
Different approaches to high-quality grammatical error correction have been proposed recently, many of which have their own strengths and weaknesses. Most of these approaches are based on classification or statistical machine translation (SMT). In this paper, we propose to combine the output from a classification-based system and an SMT-based system to improve the correction quality. We adopt the system combination technique of Heafield and Lavie (2010). We achieve an F 0.5 score of 39.39% on the test set of the CoNLL-2014 shared task, outperforming the best system in the shared task.
46
Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd J. Ward et al. · 2001 · 21.5K citations · Full text
Philipp Koehn, Richard Zens, Chris Dyer et al. · 2007 · 4.9K citations · Full text
A Systematic Comparison of Various Statistical Alignment Models
Franz Josef Och, Hermann Ney · Computational Linguistics · 2003 · 3.9K citations · Full text