The Limitations of Hierarchical Organization

Angela Potochnik, Brian J. McGill

Philosophy of Science · 2012 · 183 citations · 42 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The concept of levels of organization is prominent in science and central to debates in philosophy of science, yet many difficulties plague the concept of universal and discrete hierarchical levels, undermining commonly ascribed implications. The authors propose scale as a promising alternative, focusing on ecology while suggesting generalizability to other hierarchical contexts. Investigating causal processes at different scales allows for a notion of quasi levels that avoids the difficulties inherent in the classic concept of levels. The study finds that scale can be applied beyond ecology to other hierarchical contexts.

Abstract

The concept of levels of organization is prominent in science and central to a variety of debates in philosophy of science. Yet many difficulties plague the concept of universal and discrete hierarchical levels, and these undermine implications commonly ascribed to hierarchical organization. We suggest the concept of scale as a promising alternative. Investigating causal processes at different scales allows for a notion of quasi levels that avoids the difficulties inherent in the classic concept of levels. Our primary focus is ecology, but we suggest how the results generalize to other invocations of hierarchy in science and philosophy of science.

References

42