Publication | Open Access
Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell’s Theorem with Entangled Photons
1.5K
Citations
36
References
2015
Year
Quantum ScienceQuantum LogicEngineeringQuantum ComputingPhysicsNatural SciencesEntangled PhotonsQuantum MeasurementQuantum DevicesQuantum CommunicationLocal RealismBell TestQuantum EntanglementQuantum SensingQuantum DecoherenceMeasurement Problem
Local realism posits that physical properties exist independently of measurement and that influences cannot exceed light speed, but Bell’s theorem shows this worldview conflicts with quantum mechanics, and prior experiments have loopholes that could allow local realist explanations. Here, we report a Bell test that closes the most significant of these loopholes simultaneously. Using a well‑optimized source of entangled photons, rapid setting generation, and highly efficient superconducting detectors, we observe a violation of a Bell inequality with high statistical significance. Our experiment confirms quantum predictions, yielding a Bell inequality violation with a probability of ≤3.74×10⁻³¹ under local realism, an 11.5‑σ effect.
Local realism is the worldview in which physical properties of objects exist independently of measurement and where physical influences cannot travel faster than the speed of light. Bell's theorem states that this worldview is incompatible with the predictions of quantum mechanics, as is expressed in Bell's inequalities. Previous experiments convincingly supported the quantum predictions. Yet, every experiment requires assumptions that provide loopholes for a local realist explanation. Here, we report a Bell test that closes the most significant of these loopholes simultaneously. Using a well-optimized source of entangled photons, rapid setting generation, and highly efficient superconducting detectors, we observe a violation of a Bell inequality with high statistical significance. The purely statistical probability of our results to occur under local realism does not exceed 3.74×10^{-31}, corresponding to an 11.5 standard deviation effect.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1