Radiation Oncology · 2012 · 48 citations · 27 references
MedicineOncologyRadiation OncologyClinical Radiation OncologySurgical OncologyTreatment PlanningAnal CancerRadiation TherapyAnal Cancer RadiotherapyAnal Cancer StagingConcurrent TherapyIntensity-modulated Radiation Therapy DosimetryIntensity-modulated Radiation Therapy EffectsPrimary Tumor Classification
PURPOSE: To assess outcomes of patients with carcinoma of the anal canal (CAC) treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHOD AND MATERIALS: From August 2007 to January 2011, seventy-two patients suffering from CAC were treated with IMRT. Concurrent chemotherapy was added in case of locally advanced tumors. Radiation course consisted in delivering an initial plan to the PTV1 defined as the primary tumor and the risk area including pelvic and inguinal nodes. Forty-five Gy in daily 1.8 Gy-daily fractions were delivered five days a week. A second plan of 14.4-20 Gy to the primary tumor (PTV2) was administered in 1.8-2 Gy-daily fractions, 5 days a week. We present here the results of dosimetry, toxicities, and clinical outcome of the first 39 patients with a median follow-up of 24 months. RESULTS: Thirty-one women and eight men were included in the present analysis. Tumors were classified as stages I, II, III and IV in 2, 7, 27 and 2 patients, respectively. Median age was 59 years (range, 38-85). Radiotherapy alone (RT) or combined with chemotherapy (RCT) were delivered in 6 (15%) and 33 (85%) patients, respectively.Six patients (15%) required a treatment break ≥ 3 days, and median time for treatment break was 8 days (range, 3-14 days). Acute grade 3 gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities were seen in 10 and 5% of patients, respectively. Grade 4 toxicity was only hematologic and occurred in 12% patients receiving RCT. With a median follow-up of 24 months, no patient experienced any late grade 4 toxicity. The 2-year overall survival rate was 89%, the 2-year local relapse free survival was 77% and the 2-year colostomy-free survival rate was 85%. CONCLUSION: IMRT is well tolerated with acceptable treatment interruption allowing dose escalation.
27
AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed
FL Greene, DL Page, Fleming Id et al. · 2002 · 2.3K citations
Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy
Icru · Medical Entomology and Zoology · 1993 · 2K citations
Harry Bartelink, F. Roelofsen, F. Eschwège et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 1997 · 1.3K citations