On the Confluence of Self-Esteem Maintenance Mechanisms

Abraham Tesser

Personality and Social Psychology Review · 2000 · 523 citations · 59 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Self‑esteem regulation can involve cognitive dissonance reduction, self‑affirmation, or social comparison, and theory suggests that substituting mechanisms is more effective within the same self‑domain than across domains. The study argues that self‑esteem regulation mechanisms are substitutable, proposing that affect produced by each mechanism mediates the completion of the regulation process. The authors model substitution as an unconscious transfer of affect from an initial self‑esteem regulation mechanism to a substitute mechanism, with domain‑specific effects. The authors find that substituting self‑esteem regulation mechanisms across self‑domains is relatively resilient and easier to accomplish than within‑domain substitution.

Abstract

A case is made for the substitutability of self-esteem regulation mechanisms such as cognitive dissonance reduction, self-affirmation, and social comparison. For example, a threat to self via cognitive dissonance might be reduced by a favorable social comparison outcome. To explain substitution, it is suggested that self-esteem regulation mechanisms inevitably produce affect and that affect mediates the completion of various self-esteem regulation processes. Substitution can be understood in terms of the transfer of affect from the initial mechanism to the substitute mechanism. To be effective, this transfer must take place without awareness. Also discussed is the substitution of self-esteem regulation mechanisms across different self-domains versus within a single self-domain. Current theory suggests that substitution might be more effective within domain; that is, it is better to bolster the aspect of self that has been threatened. It is suggested here, however, that substitution across self-domain might be relatively resilient and easier to accomplish.

References

59