Annual Review of Sociology · 2011 · 478 citations · 140 references
Social SciencesGeographyHuman GeographyRural SociologyUrban GeographyUrban SociologyRural LifeRural SocietyRural SpaceRural-urban LinkagesRural-urban RelationsUrban-rural LinkagesCommunity Life CycleRural RelationsRural Social ChangeRural-urban ContinuumRural-urban GradientUrban ContinuumUrban-rural InterfaceUrban-rural Relations
The historical coincidence of spatial and social boundaries in America is changing rapidly. The review aims to map the expanding rural‑urban interface, emphasizing the scale of interdependence, boundary blurring, and the symbolic and social distinctions that shape this relationship. The authors illustrate these points by identifying ten conceptions of rural America that capture its social and economic diversity and the evolving spatial and social boundaries. The authors find that rigid rural‑urban distinctions are increasingly obsolete, and they call for integrated research to bridge the institutional divide between urban and rural scholarship.
This review outlines several key aspects of the new rural-urban interface and the growing interpenetration of American rural and urban life. The historical coincidence of spatial and social boundaries in America is changing rapidly. This review highlights (a) the enormous scale of rural-urban interdependence and boundary crossing, shifting, and blurring—along many dimensions of community life—over the past several decades, and (b) the symmetrical rather than asymmetrical influences between urban and rural areas, i.e., on bidirectional relational aspects of spatial categories. These general points are illustrated by identifying 10 common conceptions of rural America that reflect both its social and economic diversity and its changing spatial and social boundaries. Here we emphasize symbolic and social boundaries—the distinctions between urban and rural communities and people and the processes by which boundaries are engaged. Placing behaviors or organizational forms along a rural-urban continuum (or within a metropolitan hierarchy of places) or drawing sharp rural-urban distinctions seems increasingly obsolete or even problematic. We conclude with a call for new research on rural America and greater conceptual and empirical integration of urban and rural scholarship, which remains disconnected and segregated institutionally.
140
The division of labor in society
Émile Durkheim · Columbia Law Review · 1935 · 5.2K citations
Humanities, History, Sociology +15
On the Division of Labor in Society
C. E. Gehlke, Émile Durkheim, George Gaylord Simpson · Columbia Law Review · 1935 · 3.3K citations
A Space for Place in Sociology
Thomas F. Gieryn · Annual Review of Sociology · 2000 · 2.1K citations