Publication | Closed Access
The Environmental Costs and Benefits of Fracking
436
Citations
115
References
2014
Year
EngineeringEnvironmental Impact AssessmentUnconventional Energy SourceFracturing OperationsEnvironmental EconomicsEconomic InstrumentEnvironmental PolicyPetroleum ProductionFossil FuelHydraulic FracturingUnconventional OilNatural Gas ExtractionFracturing EfficiencyFossil FuelsEnvironmental EngineeringEnvironmental CostsBusinessNatural Resource EconomicsUnconventional ResourceEnhanced Oil Production
Unconventional oil and gas extraction via horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing is driving an economic boom but presents mixed environmental impacts, offering potential reductions in air pollution and water use while risking water contamination, air toxics, and hindering renewable adoption. The study identifies six priority research areas for future work, including estimating ultimate recovery, reducing water use and chemical toxicity, assessing well integrity failure rates, evaluating water contamination risks, understanding induced seismicity from wastewater injection, and quantifying greenhouse gas and air pollution impacts on ecosystems and human health.
Unconventional oil and natural gas extraction enabled by horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing (fracking) is driving an economic boom, with consequences described from “revolutionary” to “disastrous.” Reality lies somewhere in between. Unconventional energy generates income and, done well, can reduce air pollution and even water use compared with other fossil fuels. Alternatively, it could slow the adoption of renewables and, done poorly, release toxic chemicals into water and air. Primary threats to water resources include surface spills, wastewater disposal, and drinking-water contamination through poor well integrity. An increase in volatile organic compounds and air toxics locally are potential health threats, but the switch from coal to natural gas for electricity generation will reduce sulfur, nitrogen, mercury, and particulate air pollution. Data gaps are particularly evident for human health studies, for the question of whether natural gas will displace coal compared with renewables, and for decadal-scale legacy issues of well leakage and plugging and abandonment practices. Critical topics for future research include data for (a) estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) of unconventional hydrocarbons, (b) the potential for further reductions of water requirements and chemical toxicity, (c) whether unconventional resource development alters the frequency of well integrity failures, (d) potential contamination of surface and ground waters from drilling and spills, (e) factors that could cause wastewater injection to generate large earthquakes, and (f) the consequences of greenhouse gases and air pollution on ecosystems and human health.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1