British Journal of Urology · 1993 · 34 citations · 9 references
MedicineSurgeryUrologyProstate DiseaseUrogenital SurgeryUrologic SurgeryProstate Disease ComplicationsProstate DisordersProstate SurgeryUrinary IncontinenceUrinary RetentionUrinary Retention ManagementComplications Of Prostate SurgeryUreteral Stent ComplicationsUrinary Retention Complications
The Prostakath stent is recommended as an option in the treatment of acute urinary retention in the patient at high risk from a transurethral resection of the prostate. In 57 of 64 patients with acute retention, voiding was re-established. A stent-related problem developed in 16 patients and further treatment was usually required. Patients with satisfactorily functioning stents have been followed up for 12.0 +/- 9.9 months. The most frequent complication was displacement of the stent. Infection and stone formation were uncommon. Our results do not support the use of the Prostakath in patients with symptoms of outflow obstruction or chronic retention.
9
Use of stents for treating obstruction of urinary outflow in patients unfit for surgery.
G. Williams, J. Brian McLoughlin, A. EL DIN et al. · BMJ · 1989 · 60 citations · Full text
Prostatectomy in the Over 80‐year‐old
Michael G. Wyatt, Michael J. Stower, Patrick J. Smith et al. · British Journal of Urology · 1989 · 49 citations
Prostatic Stenting for Outflow Obstruction
N. W. HARRISON, J. V. DE SOUZA · British Journal of Urology · 1990 · 43 citations
Encrustation of Intraprostatic Stents–a Comparative Study
S. A. Holmes, Paul D. Miller, Peter R.E. Crocker et al. · British Journal of Urology · 1992 · 36 citations