Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2001 · 300 citations · 41 references
Life SciencesEvolutionary BiologyPlant BiologyMolecular EvolutionPhylogeneticsPlant EvolutionComparative Plant GenomicsHomology AssessmentIntron StructurePhylogenetic Tree ReconstructionPlant PhylogenySelf-incompatibility SystemsClade DelimitationCommon Ancestor ReconstructionIntron PositioningMolecular Basis Of Self-recognitionPhylogenetic ReconstructionPhylogenetic Reconstruction ModelsRejection Of Self-pollenSelf-incompatibility Evolution
T2-type RNases are responsible for self-pollen recognition and rejection in three distantly related families of flowering plants-the Solanaceae, Scrophulariaceae, and Rosaceae. We used phylogenetic analyses of 67 T2-type RNases together with information on intron number and position to determine whether the use of RNases for self-incompatibility in these families is homologous or convergent. All methods of phylogenetic reconstruction as well as patterns of variation in intron structure find that all self-incompatibility RNases along with non-S genes from only two taxa form a monophyletic clade. Several lines of evidence suggest that the best interpretation of this pattern is homology of self-incompatibility RNases from the Scrophulariaceae, Solanaceae, and Rosaceae. Because the most recent common ancestor of these three families is the ancestor of approximately 75% of dicot families, our results indicate that RNase-based self-incompatibility was the ancestral state in the majority of dicots.
41
Julie Thompson, Desmond G. Higgins, Toby J. Gibson · Nucleic Acids Research · 1994 · 64.9K citations · Full text
CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP
Joseph Felsenstein · Evolution · 1985 · 41.5K citations · Full text
MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution.
David Posada, Keith A. Crandall · Bioinformatics · 1998 · 20.1K citations