Publication | Closed Access
What Fraction of Stock Option Grants to Top Executives Have Been Backdated or Manipulated?
191
Citations
24
References
2009
Year
Empirical FinanceOrganizational EconomicsCorporate InnovationSecurities LawManipulated GrantsStock Option GrantsManagementOption GrantsAudit QualityOption PricingFinancial ManagementAccountingAuditing FirmsFinanceMarket ManipulationFinancial EconomicsBusinessAudit RegulationBeen BackdatedCorporate FinanceFinancial Risk
We estimate that 13.6% of all option grants to top executives during the period 1996–2005 were backdated or otherwise manipulated. Our study primarily focuses on grants that were unscheduled and at-the-money, of which we estimate that 18.9% were manipulated. The fraction is 23.0% before the new two-day filing requirement took effect on August 29, 2002, and 10.0% afterward. For the minority of grants that are not filed within the required two-day window, the fraction of manipulated grants remains as high as 19.9%. We further find a higher frequency of manipulation among tech firms, small firms, and firms with high stock price volatility. In addition, firms that use smaller (non-big-five) auditing firms are more likely to file their grants late. Finally, at the firm level, we estimate that 29.2% of firms manipulated grants to top executives at some point between 1996 and 2005.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1